Posts Tagged: Toronto

24
May

2010

Lost Toronto Funicular

A Funicular near Toronto's High Park. Image by Edward Dale.

I’ll admit it: One of the things I love about cable transit is the “treasure hunt” quality of the entire thing. It’s a “lost” technology with clues and remnants scattered around the world. Picking those clues up and piecing them together is – for me – one of the most exciting parts of this work.

So you can imagine how thrilled I was to receive an email from my uncle which included the picture to left. He stumbled upon it the other day and snapped a photo of it.

This funicular, unbeknownst to me, is located near High Park in my hometown of Toronto, Canada. I’ve yet to find any research on the system.

Lost or unknown infrastructure is nothing new to Torontonians, but to discover a funicular is almost totally unheard of:

Who built it and when? Why? Is it still operational? Who owns it? What was it used for? Could we use it today? Would we want to use it today?

So many questions, too few answers. So, Toronto: Do you know anything about the High Park Funicular?



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

27
Apr

2010

TTC Triples Price of Metropass (For Some)

Last week the Toronto Star carried an article titled Free Metropasses latest Condo Perk. The title suggests a pleasant surprise; a quality gesture designed to enhance the lives of Torontonians. It is a ‘perk’ after all.

Problem is, this is no perk. This is a City-mandated program which in essence triples the price of Metropasses for new condo purchasers in Toronto. Let me explain:

The new program forces condominium developers in high-density areas of Toronto to provide a year’s supply of transit passes to purchasers of units in new developments as of April 28th. Howard Moscoe, the City Councillor who introduced the policy says its “a carrot that will get people onto public transit.”

Developers, however, will bury the cost of those Metropasses (and their related administration costs) into the price of the condo units. Here’s where the problem comes in.

According to the TTC, the annual cost of a Metropass in Toronto is $1,068. According to Stephen Dupuis of the Building Industry and Land Development Association this will add a systemic cost of $1,400 to each new unit.

Now, let’s amortize that price over the lifespan of a typical mortgage . . . See where I’m going with this? Because the price of the Metropass is now built into the price of a new home, it becomes subject to the mortgage interest.

Using the TD Canada Trust Mortgage Calculator, let’s assume monthly payments, a 6.65% interest rate and a 30-year payment schedule. Monthly mortgage payments on that single Metropass therefore work out to $8.90, meaning that the price of this $1,068 Metropass balloons to $3,204, triple the original price.

Whether you’re pro-transit or not, I don’t see how anyone can think this is a good idea. It basically punishes those people who should be rewarded for choosing transit-friendly, dense, urban living.



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

14
Apr

2010

Zombie Streetcars & Transit Bling

One of San Francisco's Fleet of Classic Streetcars.

I am decidedly against the City of Toronto’s decision to purchase almost 2 billion one-and-a-quarter billion dollars worth of new streetcars/light rail. And my problem with the decision has absolutely nothing to do with my position on CPT. I recognize that CPT is not a technology for all environs and I recognize that streetcar technology has its place.

My position on CPT is that it should be included as one among many transit technologies including bus, streetcar/light rail and subway. So let’s leave it at that. Back to the streetcars . . .

My problem with purchasing new vehicles to replace the old fleet is this: It’s nothing more than wasteful Transit Bling. In times of economic trouble, it seems irresponsible to replace that which could be rebuilt. Are Toronto’s existing streetcars decrepit?  Sure.  Are they falling apart?  Probably. Are they comfortable to ride? Not on your life. But none of those issues are unresolvable.

Havana is well-known for its plethora of 1950’s and 1960’s classic American cars.  These cars are at least a generation older than Toronto’s current aging streetcar fleet, but are in good condition, having been well-maintained and rebuilt several times.  These never-dying  zombie cars, have in fact, become something of a tourist attraction themselves.

Classic American cars crowd the roads of Havana to this day. They have even become an unofficial tourist attraction. Despite their age of 50-60 years, they are in good working condition due to ongoing maintenance and rebuilds.

So why then rush to abandon the current fleet of streetcars in Toronto?  Surely there must be some experienced mechanics, engineers and designers capable of creatively rebuilding the fleet at a fraction of the cost of buying new vehicles (around $5-6 million each). I’m even more certain there’s some inexperienced mechanics, engineers and designers in university who could do it. And if they did, it would be a testament to Toronto’s ingenuity, fiscal prudence, dedication to the environment and history.

San Francisco did just that with a fleet of Zombie Streetcars they purchased on the second/third hand market. The great irony is that many of those streetcars were never part of that city’s historic fleet. Instead, they were vehicles that had once serviced cities as far and wide as Kansas City, Philadelphia, Cleveland and . . . Toronto.

And just to one up those cities further, San Francisco painted these cars in colour schemes that replicated those of their original city of operation. The city positioned them as “Commemorative” streetcars, in effect celebrating that which other cities chose to dispose of. This was brilliant marketing to locals and tourists alike. (The streetcars are not a Toy for Tourists, they are instead an integral part of the San Francisco Muni system.) San Francisco took other cities’ “junk” and put it to good use because they recognized the inherent value these vehicles possessed when others didn’t.

It’s like being savvy enough to spot a Picasso at a yard sale whose owner is selling for $1.

Streetcars in San Francisco are not accessible, but redesigned platform ramps provide the same level of accessibility.

The one argument you could make in support of new purchase over rebuild is the issue of accessibility, which is a 100% legitimate agrument. Sort of.

Are San Francisco’s zombie streetcars accessible? No. But is the system itself accessible? Yes. All streetcar platforms were equipped with simple and cost-effective ramps that, in effect, give the streetcars complete accessibility.

Most amazing is that the San Francisco streetcars date from the early part of the last century. Many of them are 2-3 times older than the streetcars Toronto plans to replace. They’re also stylish to no end with a story that capture people’s attention and imagination.

Ironically, Toronto knows this. The city maintains a couple of these very same Zombie Streetcars for private charter operation and special event rental.

Infrastructure is part of our collective civic imagination and history. Merely replacing this infrastructure every 20 or 30 years robs us of something innate and valuable.

Maybe using Zombie Streetcars doesn’t play as well in the media as spending billions of dollars on brand new Transit Bling. But in the long run, it seems like a far more logical and stylish investment.

At the very least, San Francisco knows where to get a new lot of vintage Toronto streetcars for a very good price.


Creative Commons images by bstoragegj_theWhite and tibchris.



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

02
Apr

2010

Preserve Your Legacy

Transit planning is a political act, no two ways about it. And as such, transit is subject to all the bumps and grinds characteristic of political and economic cycles.

But unlike smaller scale legacy projects (because, let’s be honest, transit is as much about legacy building as much as it is about transportation), transit is particularly susceptible to political change and cycle. Most transit projects take years – if not decades – to move from initial conception through to completion. Rail and subway projects take more time than any.

This points to one of the major advantages of cable transit. After all planning and approvals take place, a cable system can be manufactured, assembled and installed in a space of 10 – 14 months. This speed of installation is made possible by prefabricated parts being manufactured off-site in a climate-controlled environment.

As a cable system has a very small land footprint, business and commerce can continue at street level unabated while installation occurs. No worries about local merchants delaying a project due to concerns about lost parking spaces, vehicular or sidewalk traffic.

In general, because the low-cost and ease of construction of cable transit is so opposite of traditional transit technologies (except, maybe, local bus service) a system can move from conception through to operation in a space of time less than the standard term of political office. That means politicians willing to move forward with a cable transit project can do so without concern of political machinations and electoral cycles endangering those projects’ future.

Just read about the just announced cancellation of Toronto’s Transit City plan to see what I mean.

To realize transit projects, you need speed and brevity. Cable transit can provide that in spades.



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

25
Jan

2010

Pedestrian Safety & Sight-Seeing

From the Toronto Star, January 23rd, 2010.



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

20
Jan

2010

Survey Says . . .

It took me a while, but I’ve finally compiled all the comments left online to the Toronto Star article that appeared last month. Here, in a completely unscientific study, I present the results.

Most of the comments left could be categorized in one of four ways:

  1. This is the worst idea I have ever heard of in my life.
  2. This is a good idea that is worthy of further investigation.
  3. Whether it is a good idea or a bad one, the real problem is with our current transit planning regime.
  4. Steven Dale is a complete idiot who should learn to shut his mouth.

Here are the percentages of comments that fell within those categories:

  1. (36.73%)  This is the worst idea I have ever heard of in my life.
  2. (33.67%)  This is a good idea that is worthy of further investigation.
  3. (22.45%)  Whether it is a good idea or a bad one is irrelevant. The real problem is our current transit planning regime.
  4. (7.14%)  Steven Dale is a complete idiot who should learn to shut his mouth.

In order to dig a little deeper, however, I also compiled the percentage of people within the “thumbs-up-thumbs-down” crowd who agreed with the consensus in each category. Those results are rather striking:

  1. 71.62% of people within the thumbs-up-thumbs-down crowd agreed that cable transit is a good idea that is worthy of further investigation.
  2. 68.60% of people within the thumbs-up-thumbs-down crowd agreed that whether cable transit is a good idea or a bad one is irrelevant. The real problem is our current transit planning regime.
  3. 51.92% of people within the thumbs-up-thumbs-down crowd agreed that cable transit is the worst idea they had ever heard of in their life.
  4. 41.48% of people within the thumbs-up-thumbs-down crowd agreed that Steven is a complete idiot who should learn to shut his mouth.

I’ve gotta’ say, considering the knee-jerk, reactionary nature of online comments . . . those aren’t bad numbers no matter how completely unscientific they are.



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.

31
Dec

2009

Thanks

I’d just like to thank everyone for the kind words and support the above article generated.

I actually found out this article had landed after the fact. Myself and my partner, Gabriela, were driving home from visiting the Hungerburgbahn in Austria. I received a phone call on my cell from the Toronto radio station CFRB. They wanted an interview. About what, I asked.

About what, indeed . . . One interview spiraled into several and now here we are:  Cable’s gone mainstream. Of course, lurking in the shadows is the typical Rabble, but that’s just par for the course, I suppose.

Have a happy New Years Eve, everyone! I’m going to relax, recoup and get myself ready for tomorrow.  A whole new year, a whole new decade and – with a little bit of luck and a whole lotta’ passion- a whole new era’s literally a day away.  Kinda’ exciting . . .



Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.